Sennheiser RS 120 RF Stereo Wireless headphone System with an Extra HDR 120 Headphone Receiver

Customer Ratings:
List Price: Price Unavailable
Sale Price: $149.95
Today's Bonus:

I use these headphones to watch TV without bothering other family members watching TV in another room. I have had other brands that did not have good reception and/or had a lot of static. The sound on these Sennheisers is crisp and clear--much better than the sound that comes from the TV speakers

Read More >>

Klipsch IMAGE S4i-WH Premium Noise-Isolating Headset with 3-button Apple control, White Bonus Pack

Customer Ratings:
List Price: Price Unavailable
Sale Price: Price Unavailable
Today's Bonus:

listen to music answer calls i use it when i'm needing to keep my hands free for note taking. great

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

I loved the sound but these are not well constructed for the type of use. This was my second (and last). The ear pod shell separated within the first week of use.

Buy Klipsch IMAGE S4i-WH Premium Noise-Isolating Headset with 3-button Apple control, White Bonus Pack Now

I purchased these because my dog ate my Bose earbuds. These wires feel less durable (thinner) but they have held up okay so far and I am pretty rough on my earbuds. They are definitely worth the money and the sound is very very good--better than my Bose were!

Read Best Reviews of Klipsch IMAGE S4i-WH Premium Noise-Isolating Headset with 3-button Apple control, White Bonus Pack Here

Seen the good reviews so thought I would give them a try. My Bose QC15 are great and I love them but too big and hot for long walks or at the gym. These are way better than I expected I had a pair of beats before that I gave away, good bass but that's it. Way overpowered everything else. The klipsch earbuds fit like no other, they are comfortable, stay in and sound amazing with great bass with unbelievable highs and mids too. Great all around sound at a price better than buds much more expensive. These far exceeded my expectations. I would recommend these to anyone in any price point.

Want Klipsch IMAGE S4i-WH Premium Noise-Isolating Headset with 3-button Apple control, White Bonus Pack Discount?

The Klipsch S4i earphones are excellent sound quality, comfortable, do an excellent job of blocking out noise, & the apple control buttons are very convient.

Read More >>

3.5mm Stereo M-F Headphone Extension Cable 15 ft. Coiled

Customer Ratings:
List Price: $5.99
Sale Price: $5.79
Today's Bonus: 3% Off

I bought this to extend the distance from my laptop to the stereo receiver so iTunes & youTube can be played from sitting on the sofa without having to get up constantly. The coiled cord makes it better so as to not accidently trip over it (highly visible) and looks professional.

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

So far so good. I have experienced no problems using it so far. No sound problems that I can tell.

Buy 3.5mm Stereo M-F Headphone Extension Cable 15 ft. Coiled Now

I was not expecting to run across this as I was browsing in the Kindal accessory department of Amazon. Now I don't have to sit with my Kindal on my lap while watching a movie with the short extension from the headphones...I can move away from the device and still hear everything The price was inexpensive and the quality good and it works perfectly! What great service...as usual the delivery on time and the packaging excellent..that is Amazon for you!

Read Best Reviews of 3.5mm Stereo M-F Headphone Extension Cable 15 ft. Coiled Here

I've had problems with cords like these eventually falling apart, and usually after 5 months max. But these lasted me for about a year and a half, and one is still going. At this price they are the best value in a basic headphone cable.

Want 3.5mm Stereo M-F Headphone Extension Cable 15 ft. Coiled Discount?

Read More >>

iDance FUNKY500 Headphones - White

Customer Ratings:
List Price: $49.00
Sale Price: $41.97
Today's Bonus: 14% Off

• Wireless Bluetooth technology for an over ear headphones
• High definition built in microphone
• Standby time of up to 75 hours, Continuous usage time up to 8 hours
• Frequency response: 20HZ-20KHZ, 40 mm Neodymium Speaker driver and Impedance 32 ohms
• Rechargeable lithium ion battery 3.7V 300mA, Charging thru computer USB interface/output DC5V/500mA charge

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

I think it this headphone drives the upper frequency range slightly better than the lower, but with good equalizer use you can produce the driving bass u desire (if u do). Very comfortable fit. So far the design has proved to be much more physically durable than the Jocky model. In conclusion, all I dance headphones sound amazing, so just choose the style that represents u best, and fits the level of activity u usually do.

Buy iDance FUNKY500 Headphones - White Now

I bought these for my daughter who is a singer and song writer. She loves how good the music sounds and they block out the outside noises. She said these headphones are the best she's ever had.

Read More >>

Behringer UB502 Eurorack UB502 Mixer (5 Inputs)

Customer Ratings:
List Price: Price Unavailable
Sale Price: $49.99
Today's Bonus:

• Ultra low-noise ULN design, highest possible headroom, ultra-transparent audio
• State-of-the-art, IMP "Invisible" Mic Preamp with 130 dB dynamic range for 24-bit, 192 kHz sampling rate inputs
• Effective, extremely musical 2-band EQ and clip LED on mono channel
• 5 balanced high-headroom line inputs
• Main mix outputs plus separate headphone and 2-track output

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

Well if you need lots of functions and a bus mix for effects this is not for you. But if you play say some small coffie shops or small gigs where you dont need alot of inputs or what you need is to run a iPod or some other device and 1 mic line (this does not have phantom power) then this is for you. I use this for very small gigs where I play guitar flamenco into a Fishman Aura which then goes into my Trace TA 50R UK model into line one, then for the second line on the amp I run the Mic line to the UB 502 and plug a Shure Mic, Line 6 PodXT Pro, iPod, and a Mac G4 Powerbook, it works great becase I dont use any effects nor do I need to ajust the tone. Its small to fits in the palm of your hand about two times the size of Plam Piolt.

Buy Behringer UB502 Eurorack UB502 Mixer (5 Inputs) Now

I've wanted a mixer for a long time now, and I finally got this one. At first I wanted the next biggest one, the UB802, I think. When I was thinking about when it when it would come. When it did, I was almost unsure what it was when I saw the box! It's so tinyI thought it would be much bigger (Guess I didn't look very hard at the product description!)

It's amazing the sound you can get with this and even a cheap pair of speakers and a microphone (I use a Behringer mic, also. Ultravoice.)

I'm quite happy with this and if you're looking for a mixer on a budget, this one will be amazing for a small home studio. However, if you want to make something bigger, you'll want to get one of the bigger models in this series (Behringer UB).

I'm thrilled!

Read Best Reviews of Behringer UB502 Eurorack UB502 Mixer (5 Inputs) Here

I work in the field of on-line education, so I sometimes find myself needing to pull audio from different sources into my computer. This unit handles multiple inputs well, has a variety of input types (XLR, 1/4" phone plugs, RCA jacks), and does a good job of adjusting input levels between different sources. It seems to be pretty quiet, too -doesn't add any extraneous noise to the audio that I can tell. It's also portable, an important feature when you may need to record something on location.

Recommended.

Want Behringer UB502 Eurorack UB502 Mixer (5 Inputs) Discount?

I wanted to get something simple to plug a mike with a XLR adapter into our computer to record an acoustic guitar and voices. This was perfect. It has a 2 band EQ, which made the guitar sound great, when I tweaked it a bit. Works like a charm. If you don't want to spend a lot of bucks for features you don't need, this is the thing for you. Oh, did I mentiom how nice and compact it is?

This is perfectly sized for my audio podcast and voice recording applications. Good, solid, basic. It's all I need.

One caveat: if your microphone requires phantom power, be sure to get a separate power supply--I must've picked the only Behringer model that doesn't do it!

Otherwise, it's a keeper.

Read More >>

M-Audio Studiophile Q40 Closed-back Dynamic Headphones

Customer Ratings:
List Price: Price Unavailable
Sale Price: Price Unavailable
Today's Bonus:

• frequency response: 10Hz to 20kHz
• sensitivity: 116dB SPL (1mW IEC318)
• rated impedance: 64 ?
• weight without cable: 0.25 kg
• magnet material: neodymium

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

I can only say that I completely agree with my other reviewer as I am the second to review these great phones.

M-Audio is a well known name in the music world but this is their first foray into headphones. I am still a beginner audiophile so these were my first entry level purchase. I am coming from the Koss Porta Pro. These are like the big brother Porta Pro, which is everything I was looking for. The bass is definitely present, but not muddy or overpowering.

You would pick these up if you listen to hip hop/rap or rock. These may not be so good for classical or music where you are looking for a large soundstage as closed headphones lack that aspect.

Buy M-Audio Studiophile Q40 Closed-back Dynamic Headphones Now

I decided to take the plunge and take a chance on this relatively new brand and purchase my first real set of headphones (had an akg k26 p before). Got it on Monday and I've been very pleased with it thus far. Bass is right there and should be comparable to many sub $150 headphones (except the DT770s) judging from other user reviews at head-fi.org. I use it primarily for movies and so sound detail is important and the Q40 definetly delivers on that aspect. The build is sturdy (Not a fan of flimsily made headphones... ahem Grados, Senns, Denons) and its not too heavy. My ears started to get warm after about 1 hour but that's expected with any closed style headphones. Isolation is excellent and sound leak is minimal... although certainly no IEM .

The kicker for me was the price of course. at around 100 bucks incl shipping. I don't know any comparable headphone out there at that price range.

Great for

-hiphop, heavy rock, movies, gaming

Look elsewhere if you're into (Denon D1001?)

-classical, techno

Read Best Reviews of M-Audio Studiophile Q40 Closed-back Dynamic Headphones Here

Other reviewers have covered the key aspects of these headphones: The quality is good, and they are very comfortable to wear for long periods of time. The purpose of this review is to call out a feature that I particularly like as a parent: The cord is removable and replaceable. I bought these headphones for my 16-year old son, who goes through headphones at a frightening pace. The failure is always at the same place, namely where the cord enters the headphones. With the Q40s, the cord has a standard plug on both ends. This means that the connection is much more durable than with other headphones, and also that the cord can be replaced cheaply if it does wear out. Great design!

One other note: The other end of the cord is a standard 1/4 inch plug, but if you unscrew it you'll find a standard micro stereo plug. At first my son and I both missed this, because it's a screw-off rather than a pull-off connector.

Want M-Audio Studiophile Q40 Closed-back Dynamic Headphones Discount?

This is my second pair, the reason im on my second is because when i bought them the first time i thought the cord was messed up so i sent them back, and received a new pair, when you plug them in the headphones, make sure you screw them in, its no just a push in, you must screw them in, the bass is beautiful as well as the sound, a smiled the moment i heard the bass, the cord is a little longer than i want, but thats not a big deal, i just use a piece of string and tie them shorter. i also read reviews of people talking about how the cords mess up and they cant get a replacement, so i bought the alternate replacement cord already, so im await them, and being prepared for anything. great headphones, i would recommend

I bought a pair of M-audio av40's and that is what got me to notice the brand. I picked up these headphones after hearing wonderful reviews over at head-fi.org, and i can tell you that you will not be disappointed. I am a basshead and love listening to reggae and rap and hip hop as well as dubstep and the like and i can tell you these are just magical. The bass is wonderful, they squeeze your head enough so they don't move around, a lot of people complain about it but i personally really like it. The ear cups are not very comfortable because they are so shallow, i ordered a pair of ear pads from beyerdynamic that are for the dt-770 and i will tell you they are a must buy. While i waited though i got used to the stock pads and i honestly don't mind them much at all, though the replacements are on a wholenother level. I don't want to say "for the price you cant go wrong" screw the price man you just cant go wrong period if you buy these.

Read More >>

Sennheiser HD 380 Pro Collapsible High-End Headphone for Professional Monitoring Use (Black)

Customer Ratings:
List Price: $299.95
Sale Price: $140.99
Today's Bonus: 53% Off

• Extended frequency response for accurate, reliable sound reproduction.
• Increased sound pressure level (110db) to handle demanding use.
• Exceptional comfort for extended listening.
• Carrying case included for engineers on the go.
• Easily replaceable parts for long service life.

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

I've been a huge fan and user of Sennheiser headphones for the last three years, and have had many of their headphones (HD200, HD201, HD215, HD280, EH150, CX300 All still work fantastically, I've just been expanding my collection) as well as a few other brands and models (Sony MDR V700, Pioneer HDJ1000). That being said, I will be reviewing the 380s and how they compare to the HD280s.

First, the construction and design the 380s have been entirely reworked from the previous 280 design. The ear-pads now sit at an angle to the headband, meaning that they cover the ears completely while still allowing the band to sit comfortably on one's head. Additionally, while they do sit tightly on the ears, there is less of a "vice grip" effect that was heavily criticized for the 280s. Another improvement is that now, while the ear-cushions sit around one's ears, the actual pad on the inside of the cup does not touch one's ear. This arrangement is much more agreeable than the 280s, where the ear-pad was in constant contact. Also, the swivel on the 280s has been reversed in direction. While this is a bit strange, there is still enough give in the cups to allow one ear monitoring (as a DJ, this is invaluable). Just out of curiosity, I compared the noise cancellation to both the Sony MDR-NC7s and the Bose Triports they were just as good as either of these models (although the Triports leather is much more comfortable). Finally, while they are a bit heavier than other full headsets (7.7 oz), they do not feel as heavy as they should. In fact, they feel much lighter than the 280s (7.8 oz), perhaps because of the new design.

Now, the sound HUGE HUGE HUGE improvement over the 280s. The 380s provide an even clearer and more analytical sound than their predecessor. Another change has been the soundscape within the ear-cups. The 280s project the sound (in my opinion) as if it were a beam right into the ear canal: the 380s create an environment of sound that surrounds one's ear and draws the listener in. By doing this, it creates a much more enjoyable experience while not sacrificing the clarity of the music. Finally, the bass impact and response have been improved and given some force. Whereas an equalizer had to be used to "correct" the 280s, it is not needed for the 380s. That being said, they are not bass-heavy, just accurate.

Finally, some things to consider. The price tag is $200, so even if you're into music production or DJing (that's why I got them), the price may still be a bit steep. Also, if you do buy these, you MUST increase the bitrate of your MP3s. Anything less than 192 Kbps is just too low, and you WILL NOTICE the lack of clarity (I rip at 320 Kbps, or preferably WAV or FLAC). This being said, an iPod will have no trouble running these headphones, as is a problem with some higher impedance headphones (>64 Ohms).

I wholeheartedly recommend these headphones, for both their clarity and comfort. If you get a chance, swing by your local Guitar Center and give them a listen. I guarantee you'll be in love. If these aren't what you need, be sure to hit and look around. Great info there. Good luck with your decision, and enjoy if you do buy them!!

EDIT I can't believe I'm actually saying this, but no, I am not paid for my opinions nor in any way do I make money in any audio-related field (as was suggested in one review, though not at me specifically). I'm a grad student in chemistry, and I only purchase items after hours of research. If I seemed somewhat knowledgeable in the field of headphones, it's only because of lots of reading done at head-fi.org and comparing the sounds of different brands. I prefer accuracy (i.e. the "true" nature of the sound) so I love my Sennheisers.

Buy Sennheiser HD 380 Pro Collapsible High-End Headphone for Professional Monitoring Use (Black) Now

I am going to compare this model to the HD 280 Pro, which I have owned for several years.

My pair of HD 280 Pro's were getting a bit beat up from wear, so I decided to try this updated version. Compared to the 280, these are a more sleeker design, and appear to be better to handle frequent use. The 280 will eventually have cracks in the plastic headband easily repaired with super glue, and may eventually need taping to hold the parts in place, but this is only a cosmetic flaw. Also, the pads will not fall apart like most Sony and cheaper headphones. The 380 has no parts in the headband to easily break or come lose, so durability is improved. The 380 also comes with a carrying case, that provides a tight fit for getting the coiled cord inside. The 380 is also lighter and requires a little less power from a flash drive player than the 280.

One reason I bought these was because they were advertised to surround the ear, whereas the 280 would rest on my ears (but not uncomfortably so). The 380 does surround the ear and the band provides a tight and fairly comfortable fit for long listening times. Surprisingly, I found that the 280 had a slightly better ability to block the sound of an air cleaner fan in my listening room, otherwise, both models provide good isolation for you and outsiders.

As to sound quality, there is a significant improvement in the bass response of the 380, while the upper frequency response has remained very good. Both models will easily play on a flash or CD player and do not need a separate amplifier. They offer detailed sound reproduction that cheaper headphones lack, and you will notice the difference between lower end MP3 bit rates and higher ones, such as 128 kbps vs. 192 kbps.

The HD 380 costs twice as much as the older model, but I think it is worth it, especially if you are deciding between the two. Better design, better bass response, carrying case, and fit over the ears. While I have high quality earphones, I still prefer the feel of bass sounds delivered by headphones, especially for trance, rock and other kinds of music that heavily use percussion.

Read Best Reviews of Sennheiser HD 380 Pro Collapsible High-End Headphone for Professional Monitoring Use (Black) Here

In my quest to search for the best closed, non-noise-cancelling headphones that will do a satisfactory job of isolating the engine rumble of the bus that I take to and from work, I found that the choices are very few. I ultimately decided on purchasing two pairs, the Sennheiser HD 380 pro and the Shure SRH840. Prior to testing the differences between these two headphones, I ran both of them through my home audiophile stereo system at high volume for over 50 hours each plus another 20 hours each of casual listening to and from work.

First, the dimensions of each can. The Senn's are bigger and more oval shaped than the Shures. The Senn's cans measure approximately 4 9/16 inches by 3 7/16 inches, while the Shure's is more roundish, although still oval, measuring about 4 2/16 inches by 3 1/2 inches. The longer length of the Senn's may bother people like myself who suffer from TMJ syndrome (jaw problem due to clenching), which may also be further induced by its vice like pressure. The Shure's are not long enough to reach my jaw, and they fit more loosely but still snug enough to keep firmly on my head. The depth, the length of the outside of the leather that covers your ears to the felt of the inside of the can, is 1 1/16 inches in the Senn's and only about 3/4 of an inch for the Shures. This is a huge difference. My normal size ears actually touch the inside felt of the Shure's, but this rarely bothered me. This vast difference led me to believe that the Senn's will have a better soundstage; however, I was not able to detect any difference. The Senn's have a very thin and porous felt, and it is easy to see the speaker. However, the Shure's felt is thicker and far less porous, and therefore, it is not possible to see the speaker. Perhaps the speaker in the Shure's is further recessed, which may be the reason that I was not able to detect a difference in the soundstage.

I like the fact that the Shure's wire is a screw on, so if the wire breaks, it can be replaced. I believe that the Senn's wire is a permanent fixture, but I am not certain; however, I do know that they are not the screw on type. Although they both come with a case, I much prefer the Senn's case. It is a somewhat hard case, but at the same time somewhat soft difficult to explain. Anyway, it is very cool. It even has a strap like handle very cool. It fits very easily in my briefcase. The headphone case has a zipper and can be completely enclosed. The Shure's case is leather with a draw string, but it cannot be completely enclosed, and takes up a lot more space in my briefcase, and is not nearly as cool. I was not impressed.

In my subjective casual listening to these headphones during my commute to and from work, I felt that the Senn's isolated the outside sounds of the engine rumbles of the bus perhaps 10%-20% better than the Shures. I did a more objective test in my house, as I put the headphones on without music and listened to my air conditioner. The Senn's clearly isolated better. Still, the Shure's did a satisfactory job.

Now it was time to test the sound. First, I wanted to know if the headphones would sound different through an mp3 player (320 bit rate) compared to through my stereo system. I did a blind test. The difference was clear it took me only between 5 and 10 seconds to know which sounded better. I came up with the same results time and time again. The headphones sounded superior, much cleaner and sharper, when connected to my home stereo. I am not sure how much of the difference was due to the mp3's compressed sound of the copy or to the huge difference in the quality between my audiophile stereo amplifier to the low quality amp of the mp3 player. However, my test may lead me to one day buy a portable amplifier for my headphones, if a company ever comes up with a high quality amp that uses a rechargeable battery instead of a 9v battery lasting only a week or two.

I wanted to know which is more efficient ( obtaining more headphone volume at the same amp volume setting.) I raised the volume in my amp until I was able to hear something. This test proved to me that the Senn's are efficient but only sightly. I used music with only midrange in this test.

Now I wanted to see which headphones sound better at least to my ears. To me, better means more faithful frequency response, extended bass, and crisp and open sound. I used my audiophile stereo system as the reference. I listened to songs that I am very familiar with Stevie Wonder, Frank Sinatra, Count Basie, Chicago, Elton John, Melissa Manchester, Kelly Clarkson, Steely Dan, Donald Fagen, George Winston, and Johann Sebastian Bach. I listened for many hours. I listened at high volumes and at very, very, low volumes. There is definitely a huge difference in the sound. By far the biggest difference is in the middle to high part of the bass, such as sounds produced by the bass guitar, bass drums, and synthesizer bass. I am completely convinced that the Senn's have an exaggerated mid to high bass. The Shure's mid to high bass always sounded far closer to the faithfulness of my reference. The difference is staggering. The only reason that I still listen to the Senn's with music with a lot of mid to high bass is that the rumble of the busses dampen the exaggerated bass; however, once I step off the bus, I always wish that I was listening to the Shure's. So, when I listen to say Stevie Wonder, Steely Dan, and Chicago, I much prefer to listen to the Shure's.

I must say, however, that although the Senn's mid to high bass is definitely exaggerated, its mids and high are impressive enough and the bass is tight enough, that the whole music spectrum can still be appreciated. However, the whole music spectrum is more appreciated with the Shure's, as it too has a tight bass and has mids and highs that are even more impressive than the Senn's.

Listening to music having a deeper bass than mentioned above, for example the plucking of the bass fiddle in Count Basie's CB Express and Satin Doll, the Senn's were a little more impressive than the Shure's. Going still deeper in the bass, the bowing (you know, when the musician uses the bow in the string instrument) in Bach's concertos, I was surprised to find out that the Shure's went equally deep as the Senn's. With bass this deep, it is nearly impossible to exaggerate the bass, so ultimately the headphones with the more powerful bass is the one with the better deep bass. I found that sometimes the Senn's sounded slightly better and at times the Shure's sounded slightly better. At one part of the music, I decided to listen at the lowest possible volume to find out at what volume would I not be able to hear the bass anymore. The Shure's actually did slightly better than the Senn's during this test. However, at a different part of another concerto, I felt something in the bass with the Senn's that I felt less of with the Shure's. Consequently, my impression with the deepest part of the bass is a mixed conclusion and the differences only slight.

When I tested the mid range to high ends, I found that the Shure's made this musical spectrum sound more separated from the bass than the Senn's, but I was not certain if it was due to the exaggeration of the mid to high bass of the Senns's. However, when I listened to Bach, which mostly lacks mid to high bass, the mids and highs still sounded more separate from the bass with the Shure's. Cymbals in every music that I listened to almost always sounded more crisp and clear with the Shure's. Still, they never sounded too bright or tinny.

All the other closed, non-noise cancelling headphones that I tested at the stores simply could not match the noise isolation of the Shure's and Senn's. However, I think that the Sony MDR 900's came the closest. I did not buy the Sony's because they were too loose fitting on me. If you want headphones that have high quality sound but you are a little less concerned about isolation from outside sounds than I am, I would consider the Shure's SRH840 and the Sony MDR 900. If you are not concerned about isolation at all, then there are many, many more choices. The Denon's 2000's is just one example of a solid choice for those who want high quality sound and do not care less about isolation, but, as I mentioned, there are many, many other choices. I just wish there were more choices for folks like myself who want to enjoy listening to music while being in the middle of a raucous of a big city. For now, the Sennheiser HD 380 pro and Shure SRH840 may be the two best choices available for those who need the very best of noise isolation, without the noise-cancelling technology.

Want Sennheiser HD 380 Pro Collapsible High-End Headphone for Professional Monitoring Use (Black) Discount?

I do professional recording of classical musicians and am always on the lookout for new headphones to use "on-location" The "fold-flat" design of the HD380 pro phones was appealing as was the included hard case and the claimed high isolation level. My usual on-location, closed back monitor headphones are Sony 7509's (not the 7509HD), but I've also used Beyerdynamic DT-770's and AKG 240's, and an old pair of the classic Sony CD999's. My favorite casual listening phones are Grado RS2's, but they are useless for on-location recording because of their lack of any isolation.

My general impression of the HD380 pro's is that they have only moderately flat frequency response, which emphasizes the upper midrange. This translates to an apparent "clarity", but also causes an imbalance between the lower register instruments and the higher ones.

These phones do have good lower bass response, but also have a clear mid/upper bass "dip" and a very predominate upper midrange accentuation.

After much listening to a wide range of clean classical recordings, both my own 88.2 kHz/24 bit wav files and several commercial CDs which I feel very accurately capture musicians and instruments who's sound I know well, I'm very convinced that this assessment is accurate.

To confirm my listening impressions, I decided to run some frequency response tests comparing the HD380 pro's to my Sony 7509's. I connected a Neutrik Minirator MR1 audio signal generator to a high-end mic mixer and the phones to it's headphone monitor output jacks so each was fed by the same signal. The Mixer has very low output impedance and can easily drive many sets of phones in parallel. I ran several smooth 20 to 20kHz sweeps as well as a 31 frequency step sweep with each step lasting 200 mS. As a reference I compared the headphone output to a switched 250 Hz sine wave coming through my studio monitors (speakers). After adjusting the mixer output level so the headphones matched the 250 HZ speaker level, I attempted to judge each frequency as louder or softer than the 250 Hz reference and roughly gauge the amount of the differences, if any.

Test results;

Absolute sensitivity to a constant voltage, low Z signal:

The Sennheiser HD 380's are 5 to 6 dB less sensitive than the Sony 7509's. This is probably mostly a reflection of their higher impedance therefore drawing less current (and less power) at any signal voltage level. However, they are sensitive enough to be driven to decent levels by an iPod Touch and certainly any professional recording equipment.

Frequency response compared to a fixed 250 Hz reference (levels are subjectively noted in dB, differences judged to be less than 2 dB are listed as "flat"

Frequency (Hz), Sennheiser HD380 pro, Sony 7509

20, -12, -10

25, flat, flat

30, flat, flat

40, +3, flat

50, +3, flat

65, +3, +3

80, flat, +3

100, flat, flat

125, -3, flat

160, -3, flat

200, flat, flat

250, flat, flat

315, +3, flat

400, +3, flat

500, +3, flat

630, +6, +3

800, +6, +3

1.0K, +6, +3

1.25K, +6, +3

1.60K, +10, +3

2.0K, +10, flat

2.5K, +6, flat

3.15K, +6, +3

4.0K, +6, flat

5.0K, +6, flat

6.3K, +3, +3

8.0K, +3, +3

10K, flat, flat

12.5K, flat, flat

16K, -5, -5

20K, n.a., n.a.

Note: the drop at 16K Hz, and no response at 20K Hz, is due to my hearing and not reflective of the headphones.

I found the sound of these phones had a fairly serious effect on the apparent spectral balance of classical ensembles. To illustrate: I listened extensively to a new recording of the very fine Beethoven Project Trio which was recorded in late 2009 in the hall at the American Academy of Arts and Letters in New York. This is a piano trio (violin, cello and piano) who I've heard live, in concert at various halls and also in small (studio-like) salon situations. Listening via the Sony 7509's or through a set of room equalized studio monitors, the Trio sounded as they normally do, with their usual carefully attained balance between the three instruments. Listening through the Sennheiser HD380 pro's the sound of the cello was significantly reduced compared to the violin, which was significantly increased. This resulted in the cellist sounding as if she was sitting 8 or 10 feet further back in the hall. Additionally, the piano (in this case a very fine, carefully selected and regulated Fazioli) sounded bright and slightly "uneven" on the HD380's , but sounded normal (very fine) on the 7509's.

Another, somewhat unexpected effect, was that when listening through the Sony 7509's the room ambience was very obvious and clear, but through the HD380's the room ambience was greatly reduced and the recording sounded much more like it was made in a "dry" studio. I suspect that much of the low level reverberation that contributes to "ambience" (for this particular space) occurs in the 100 to 200 Hz octave and is not well conveyed by the Sennheisers.

Finally a few other comments:

I've seen an isolation spec. of 32 dB listed for these phones. In my experience, comparing the sound leakage in front of a pair of studio monitors playing pink noise, the isolation is more like 15 to 18 dB maximum. This is essentially the same as the Sony 7509's and is about as good as it gets with closed phones with well designed cushions.

Comfort with any phones is a very personal, subjective judgment. I found the HD380 pro's to be quite comfortable, but not quite as comfortable as the Sony 7509's which have just as much isolation, but with somewhat less head pressure.

I hope this is useful to anyone considering these for professional use. I'm only reporting what I personally heard. I don't work for Sony (or Sennheiser) and I love several of the new Sennheiser MKH 8000 series microphones, which may currently be some of the best available anywhere for recording classical music.

Your mileage may vary.

With this addition to the lineup Sennheiser seems to have made a conscious effort to move away from neutral reproduction toward the V-shaped equalization favored by rock and pop fans. The lows on the HD-380 are huge. I can see why some may find it "thrilling", but it remains the kind of thing you like if you like that kind of thing. Classical music listeners probably will not want a bassoon to sound like a foghorn.

Sennheiser makes two other sets of closed headphones, the HD-280 and the venerable HD-25. While the 380 are by far the most comfortable, if you (like me) were hoping for the same balanced acoustics and sound signature you are well advised to audition before taking the plunge.

Read More >>

Iphone Dual Microphone Adapter Cable - Works with Audio Technica ATR 3350 ATR 6550 ATR 6250 and Oth

Customer Ratings:
List Price: Price Unavailable
Sale Price: Price Unavailable
Today's Bonus:

I bought the Dual Microphone adapter cable for my iphone 4s along with two Audio Technica ATR 3350. I have yet to get it to work. It should be straight forward plug n play but I cannot get it to function. Any suggestions?

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

Yes it works with my iphone 5! Now I can hook it up to a wireless mic., so that's cool.

Buy Iphone Dual Microphone Adapter Cable - Works with Audio Technica ATR 3350 ATR 6550 ATR 6250 and Oth Now

Bought along with the audio technica for use with my galaxy s4. Was told this along with those mic's would allow me to video record. However, it doesn't. Still uses the mic on the phone itself. Not even sure who to contact about this. Perfect.

Read Best Reviews of Iphone Dual Microphone Adapter Cable - Works with Audio Technica ATR 3350 ATR 6550 ATR 6250 and Oth Here

Adapter works well on iPhone 4

I use two audio technica 3350 lavalier mics.

Make SURE batteries are up to snuff. Duracell 357 batteries seem to work best. I found 6 pack here on amazon. $10

Want Iphone Dual Microphone Adapter Cable - Works with Audio Technica ATR 3350 ATR 6550 ATR 6250 and Oth Discount?

Easy to use and well made. CAn use two microphones for iPad/iPhone or iPod Touch. Recommend it to extend the audio.

Read More >>

Yamaha YPT-310 61 Full Size Touch Sensitive Keys with 500 Tones and 32-Note Polyphony

Customer Ratings:
List Price: Price Unavailable
Sale Price: Price Unavailable
Today's Bonus:

• 61 Full Size Keys
• 32 Notes of Polyphony
• Portable Grand with the realism of a Stereo Grand Piano
• Style File Format (SFF) allows you to download style data from the internet
• 2-Track Sequencer and Flash ROM Store Your Music

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

Reviewers have a wide range of opinion regarding this keyboard, with some claiming it is terrific and others that it is awful. This note attempts to reconcile these different claims and help potential buyers make the best decision.

1. The YPT-310 is functionally identical to the earlier model YPT-300. The new model changes simply made the device more environmentally friendly ("greener").

2. The YPT-310 is not a piano. A piano doesn't need batteries or an adapter that plugs into an outlet. If you are willing to pay thousands of dollars, you can purchase a piano that produces wonderful sounds, and the key action has a good feel. On the other hand, pianos take up a lot of room. They need to be regularly tuned. They are sensitive to humidity and temperature. Eventually a piano will need to be repaired. The sound you create on a piano can bother your neighbors. In addition, pianos produce only one kind of sound, that which is generated by hammers striking strings. (Some people have done bizarre things to pianos, such as putting tacks into the hammers, but most of us are not going to make these modifications).

Pianists who have played a great deal of piano music, who have no interest in expanding their palette of musical tone color, or who have neither the time nor desire to learn about the controls on a modern synthesizer are unlikely to be happy with the YPT-310. On the other hand, someone who appreciates the tone color of different instruments and is willing to invest a small amount of time learning about synthesizers, will find that this keyboard opens up a whole new world of musical possibilities.

3. Sustain Pedal (foot pedal). The sustain pedal allows the sound to continue after you release a key. This is critically important; without a sustain pedal, you have only half an instrument. This keyboard does not come with a sustain pedal; you will have to purchase it separately. The pedal costs very little, and the cheapest one (about $15) can be glued to a piece of wood to keep it from moving around under foot.

Note: when you power up the YPT-310, the keyboard software "assumes" the foot pedal is not depressed. If the sustain stops when you press the foot pedal, that means you had it depressed when you turned on the keyboard.

4. Sound Quality. There are three ways to produce sounds from the keyboard. You can use the speakers that are part of the device; you can use the headphone jack and the analog signal available there to externally produce sound; or you can use the MIDI interface to have external equipment generate sound based on key press characteristics. The YPT-310 is capable of producing fabulous sounds as well as horrible sounds. The following notes give further details and make some specific suggestions on how to produce the more pleasing sounds.

5. Speakers and Headphones. The built-in speakers have very limited bass response; that is, the low frequency sounds (sounds with a low pitch) are weak. Ironically, some of the most beautiful sounds the YPT-310 can produce are in this low frequency range. The violin (instrument 53), flute (instrument 84), and Vibraphone (instrument 101) are examples of this. In order to hear these sounds, rather than the poor imitation coming from the built-in speakers, you will need headphones or the ability to connect the headphone output jack to a more capable sound system. If you want to listen to some of the beautiful sounds this instrument is capable of, check out the 30 second samples of the music found on the Time album at The voices from the keyboard were sent via the headphone jack to a computer where they were mixed using multi-track software. Typical of professionally mastered CDs, post processing was performed on some of these tracks using software; for example, echo effects were sometime used and multiple tracks laid down to create ensembles. However, the instrumental voices heard on every single track were generated by this inexpensive keyboard. The quality of the 30 second samples isn't the best possible, since they are in MP3 format, but you will hear some amazing sounds if you are using headphones or a good speaker-driven sound system. The tracks on the CD itself sound better. More information about the YPT-310 voices used on each track of the CD can be found at %20Baum%20-Time-%20Notes.htm).

6. Listening Environment. Your music listening environment can dramatically change how the music is perceived. For example, most cars are not good places to listen to music, especially if you don't use headphones. If you are composing music, your sonic environment can also influence the content of your compositions.

7. "I Hate Synthesizers." There are some people who simply hate the sound of synthesizers; they often describe the sound as harsh, mechanical, or cold. In addition, there sometimes is an unnatural, high frequency component to the sound. I agree that some sounds from some synthesizers have these characteristics, and I will even agree that many of the sounds from the YPT-310 sound this way. However, I also found very pleasing sounds among its many voices. Even the sounds that are less than pleasing can be put to good use. I found that some voices, such as the bassoon, could be made warmer by using the built in dual voice function to add an accompanying string section. I also found other sounds that became important compositionally, even though they sounded cold as solo voices.

8. Finding Beautiful Sounds. Because of the way this synthesizer generates different notes based on a sound sample from a real acoustic instrument, the tone quality (sometimes called tone coloration or harmonics) can depend on the pitch of the note. This is also true of real acoustic instruments, the bassoon being a striking example. As I mentioned previously, the violin, vibraphone, and flute sound especially good in their low registers on this keyboard. The "Clavi," "Baritone Sax," and "Fretless Bass 4" voices do too. Some instruments sound best when played in a range that is higher than normal. For example, the Oud sounds like a sweet, tiny bell in its upper register. If you want to produce a variety of useful sounds, you have to be willing to explore the keyboard by sampling different voices in a variety of registers and other settings.

9. The Bottom Line. For around $150, this is an amazing instrument. It can be used to produce professional quality music, if its limitations are respected and its strengths taken advantage of.

Buy Yamaha YPT-310 61 Full Size Touch Sensitive Keys with 500 Tones and 32-Note Polyphony Now

I've been playing piano for over 40 years and greatly prefer a traditional piano over an electronic one. However, this keyboard is so outstanding in every way that I forget I'm playing a keyboard and find myself simply enjoying the music that comes out of it. The sound quality is excellent, the voices are fun to play with, and the touch is quite satisfactory. On top of that, it will record and play back and has midi capability. I'm extremely pleased with this keyboard.

Read Best Reviews of Yamaha YPT-310 61 Full Size Touch Sensitive Keys with 500 Tones and 32-Note Polyphony Here

I bought this keyboard for my kids. I am absolutely satisfied. It has more features I originally thought of. The method to practice is very intuitive. The sampled instruments sound great. This instrument is worth every dollar.

Want Yamaha YPT-310 61 Full Size Touch Sensitive Keys with 500 Tones and 32-Note Polyphony Discount?

I've been really happy with my purchase of this particular keyboard. I wasn't in the market to spend enough money to get proper weighted keys. But, the touch sensitive keys on this keyboard are great. I like that it's a lot closer to playing the piano because the volume is sensitive to how hard I press the keys. It's not exactly like a real piano, of course. But, the price is right!

I freelance as an accompanist and help people out with studio recordings for demo CD's. This keyboard is what I use to practice at home, and it's definitely fine for that. The price and free shipping were great. Definitely the touch sensitive keys and natural piano sound is my favorite thing about this keyboard. I rarely change the default piano sound when I play. Some of the instrument sounds, like synth string and some of the bell sounds are nice. Most of it is just okay, but for this price, I'm happy with it.

Like most keyboards, the drum beats need work. The accompaniment with drums and bass line vary from okay to really hokey. IMO if you sing with it as a one man band, it won't sound good. You'd be better off with a good drum machine and this keyboard...or no percussion at all. A few of the drum beats are okay like the Ibiza, EuTrance, and Club Dance. Actually my favorite drum beat is the first (8BtModern) pop style. Maybe someday they'll re-create/sample some usable pop drum beats from today's songs and do away with the samba, tango, mambo beats, etc.

As with any e-keyboard, the action of the keys is easier than a real piano. Also, with only 61 keys, forget doing long arpeggio's. But the space, weight and cost savings make this a good option for many. For an inexpensive keyboard, I'd definltey recommend this Yamaha.

Read More >>

IDANCE CRAZY601 - Watt - Channel Recording Studio Equipment , Purple

Customer Ratings:
List Price: Price Unavailable
Sale Price: $29.00
Today's Bonus:

• Super Aticulated Headband,Extra Bass with Open Ear CUP,Foldable for EZ transport,Stereo headphone for iphone,with inline microphone,Light weight for outdoor digital audio,Customized Comfortable soft ear pad and headband
• Driver Unit: 44mm, Driver Type: Neodymium, Impedance: 32, Sensitivity: 108dB+/-3dB
• Frequency Response: 15Hz~20KHz, Cord Length: Approx.1.5m, Cable Type: PVC, Plug: 3.5mm ,gold chrome

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

they do the job. They are excellent for blocking outside noise and have a pretty decent sound quality although there can be a slight echo that you'll only notice if you've been around music as heavily as I have been. The mic is alright, not recording quality and eh for skype calls and the like; very echoey and crackly. What i like is they're sturdy and don't really heat your ears nearly as much as some other over the ear headphones that I've had. One downside is they were supposed to have come with a free dj software but the serial was missing on the flyer that came with the headphones. Overall, good for what you're paying and good if you have a noisy household you want to block out.

Buy IDANCE CRAZY601 - Watt - Channel Recording Studio Equipment , Purple Now

Excelentttt!!!!!!!!! i bouthg this item and the sound is incredible... you can by it i recomended, see ya . .

Read More >>

MOTU 828mk3 Hybrid Firewire Audio Interface

Customer Ratings:
List Price: $795.00
Sale Price: $749.00
Today's Bonus: 6% Off

• CueMix FX: Flexible 28 input/16 bus mixer with on-board DSP effects, including reverb with sends/returns, plus EQ,
• 28 inputs/30 outputs (at 44.1/48 kHz): No channel sharing
• Mic inputs, S/PDIF I/O, headphone out, and main outs are all handled as separate channels
• Front-panel control gives you access to any setting in your entire 828mk3 mix directly from the front panel
• Standalone operation: Program your mixes at the studio and then bring the 828mk3 to your gig without your computer

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

The good:

* clean recordings

The bad:

* motu tech support is the worst I've ever seen. I submitted a ticket regarding loud static noise when trying to play back. Turned out the firewire card I had is not compatible with motu devices. They require TI chipset firewire cards. I only figured this out after a buddy told me. Tech support got back to me after two months and didn't even have the right answer for me.

* Cannot name tracks on windows.

* No linux support.

* The user interfaces are very difficult to use (both hardware and software)

** Cuemix is complex and hard to get signal flow right because of this. All the different monitoring options and multiple volume knobs can easily put you in a state of pulling your hair out.

** Front panel knobs are too close together in that your finger cannot fit in between the volume knob and the headphone knob so you can't actually turn the thing in a normal way.

MOTU's hardware has great potential but they really need to focus on usability and window and linux support. Or they should simply drop windows support completely instead of half assing it to get customers.

Buy MOTU 828mk3 Hybrid Firewire Audio Interface Now

This interface and the MOTU support system are erratic. The device icon in Audio MIDI Setup installs correctly the first time. Then, in a later session, it appears duplicated and numbered as #2, and the original icon is grayed out. This breaks the connections of all MIDI controllers connected to the original device. Throughout various permutations it became clear that this is a persistent problem, requiring reconfiguration of the MIDI setup each time the computer and interface are powered off and back on. Initially, MOTU was enthusiastic and assured me that I should forward any questions to them. However, after a few emails, they went silent. The official technical notes I entered into their support system remain unread (as of this writing). Tech support at MOTU has consistently stated that their products work correctly, and any issues are due to other factors. This may be true in any event they do not necessarily work with the customer until the problem is resolved. I rate this product a two. It fails as a MIDI interface. It works adequately as a professional audio only interface.

Read Best Reviews of MOTU 828mk3 Hybrid Firewire Audio Interface Here

Bought this as an upgrade to my MOTU 2408mkII. It's an improvement in every way. Though considering how long this unit has been on the market, you'd think it would be less expensive. Still, a good value for home studios.

Want MOTU 828mk3 Hybrid Firewire Audio Interface Discount?

I have this hooked up via Firewire to my Windows 7 desktop PC that I use for my home studio. I run Sonar for my DAW. The audio drivers for the MOTU are rock solid and introduce no latency whatsoever. The vast selection of I/O ports and seemingly infinite configuration options make this a wonderful addition to any home studio.

If you use the included CueMix FX software to control this device you will not be able to name the inputs or mixes in the software, in other words you'll have to *memorize* what's connected to Input 1, Input 2, Mix 3, Mix 4, etc. They don't know why input labeling doesn't work in Windows and have no plans to sort it out. That's not satisfactory.

Also, my 828Mk3 issues random high pitched whines from time to time, not via its outputs but coming from some component inside the unit itself. Rebooting it cures it for a while and MOTU isn't sure what's going on. So I guess I'll have to return it.

I honestly was excited when I got this unit and saw that it was Made in the U.S. Now I sort of wish it was made in China.

Read More >>

Audio-Technica M3M

Customer Ratings:
List Price: $1,099.00
Sale Price: $799.00
Today's Bonus: 27% Off

• High-fidelity sound Band M operates between 614.000 to 647.000MHz Band L operates on frequencies between 575.000 to 608.000Mhz 1321 selectable UHF channels Automatic frequency scanning Up to 16 simultaneous systems per frequency band Three receiver modes: Personal Mix, stereo, and mono Personal Mix Control LCD information display XLR loop output (true pass-through) Adjustable squelch eliminates annoying static Pilot tone protects against RF interference Multi-level limiter (defeatable) Portable

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

I have used this system for about four months now.

It's a good unit in every way except that it doesn't provide equalization adjustments and I find that no matter what headphones I use, the signal seems quite bright. That's even with an Alien Ears CFR3 custom molded headphone that was pretty expensive.

Only other complaint I can think of at the moment is that I wish the receiver was smaller but maybe this is the normal size for this type of device.

Read More >>

Behringer MICROMIX MX400 4-Channel Mixer

Customer Ratings:
List Price: $29.99
Sale Price: $19.99
Today's Bonus: 33% Off

• Ultra-compact 4-channel line mixer to mix 4 line (MONO) signal source
• Highest sonic quality even at maximum output level
• Input Level control for each channel
• Ultra low-noise 4580 operational amplifiers for outstanding audio performance
• DC 12-Volt adapter included

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

WOULDA BEEN FIVE STARS BUT...

First things first... And the only NEGATIVE ive noticed... I bought this because i wanted to combine 2 inputs (keyboard and MP3/CD) to one output (HEADPHONES!!!) because I now have a roomate and I still need to practice... and since i plan on being in college the next 4yrs that will probably always be the case...

SO IF YOU ARE BUYING THIS INTENDING TO CONNECT HEADPHONES TO THE OUTPUT ***THEN KNOW THIS***

OUTPUT ON THIS IS MONO.... Meaning if you connect it to Stereo Headphones (which 99.9% probably are stereo) then it will only play on one side of the headphones... either R or L ear only...

--> So for full headphone sound you will need either some kind of mono headphones... or possibly some type of converter/adapter

(appears there is a... [1/4" Stereo Jack to 1/4" Mono Plug Headphone Adapter Model: 274-360

Price $2.89) that says it converts a mono to stereo headphones...

ON THE POSITIVE SIDE...

This unit is compact and beautiful... I have it currently connected to keyboard and mp3 and computer coming in to unit then going out to a 5-speaker + sub and it sounds like everything were hooked to an amp instead... sounds great...

Pros

-4 inputs

-Inputs have volume control

-Inputs are actually preamped giving you a little more volume/juice to your sound

-very little to no buzz or hum

-powered & comes with power supply (110v cable)

Cons

-No on off switch (just unplug it)

-No volume control on the output... (just done by the input volume control instead)

-Headphones only play in one ear unless maybe you have an adapter, run it through an amp w/headphone out maybe, or have/buy mono headphones

All in all a very great unit that ill probably end up keeping regardless of the headphones because it so far is amazing for its cost and what it actually does for my system... HOWEVER if you want one only for headphones... U might want to shop around first and see if you cant find one realativly the same cost buy with the headphone feature or add the adapter to your order...

Hope this helps you guys...

Here is a link to the adapter: Hosa Mono 1/4" Female to Stereo 1/4" Male Adapter GPP-419

**which if you buy the adapter you will then either need headphones with the 1/4 end or the adapter to convert from 1/8 to 1/4... Here: Hosa GPM-103 3.5mm TRS to 1/4" TRS Adaptor

Buy Behringer MICROMIX MX400 4-Channel Mixer Now

I am excited to open the box and cannot use it. The power adapter in the box is an universal adapter （100-240v） but with Europe plug. I can not use in the US. I have to buy a universal plug adapter inorder to use. Bad!

BTW the case is metal. Very solid and good feeling. Made in China. Design by Germany company.

Read Best Reviews of Behringer MICROMIX MX400 4-Channel Mixer Here

This product is built with light guage materials, so it is not suited for tossing around any old way with no regard for care. The real upside is the Behringer electronics used inside. They are whisper quiet and reliable for recording or live performance. I have used several Behringer products for a number of years and have been totally satisfied with all of them.

Want Behringer MICROMIX MX400 4-Channel Mixer Discount?

The power adapter that shipped with this unit does not work in a standard U.S. outlet!

I would have purchased another product had I known this.

Be warned the DC adapater has a European style plug, not a US style. If you want to use this in the US you must also purchase a "US to European" adapter.

Read More >>