Showing posts with label underwater headphones. Show all posts
Showing posts with label underwater headphones. Show all posts

Odyssey FRGSDNMC36000BL DJ Mixer Case

Odyssey FRGSDNMC36000BL DJ Mixer Case
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
List Price: $299.99
Sale Price: $219.99
Today's Bonus: 27% Off
Buy Now

  • All Black Anodized and Powder Coated Hardware
  • Patented Gliding Laptop Platform
  • Heavy-Duty Ball Corners

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

As a Mobile DJ, I do lots of weddings so I needed a case that is study as well as attractive. This case fits the bill nicely.

Pros: This case is well built, as I've come to expect from Odessy. It's big enough to provide plenty of protection for my Denon mixer and still have room for all of my cables and even a surge protector so that I only need to run one plug to hook up all of my most needed tabletop electronics.

Cons: There is no portal for running cable from the mixer out of the case. I don't know whether this is a design flaw or an over-site but by not having that my cabling situation is a little cumbersome having to run the mixer power cable and speaker cable to the front of the case then down to the main power supply and speakers. A portal in the back of the case would have been neater. Had I know this, I would have selected a different case but all in all, I'm satisfied. For this reason, I'm only rating the case 4 stars.

Buy Fom Amazon Now

Blue Microphones Bottle Rocket Stage 2 Tube Microphone with B8 Capsule

Blue Microphones Bottle Rocket Stage 2 Tube Microphone with B8 Capsule
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
List Price: Price Unavailable
Sale Price: $2,499.99
Today's Bonus:
Buy Now

  • Tube microphone system utilizing the Bottle Caps
  • Comes with B8 capsule, custom-built flight case, tube mic cable, shockmount and Powerstream power supply
  • Transformerless Class A discrete amplifier circuit
  • Utilizes ECC88 vacuum tube

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

Blue has produced a masterpiece. The tonal quality and warmth of the sound generated by this microphone is exceptional. I use this microphone predominately for vocal applications in an acoustically controlled environment. Besides the superior sound this mic produces, I went with this tube mic because of Blues advanced interchangeable capsules, which allow for endless versatility. These capsules emulate different sonic signature and audio patterns, so when I buy one of these capsules its like buying a whole new, very high quality microphone. All in all, I am very satisfied with this microphone, it has surpassed my expectations. Be sure to use a high quality preamp and A-D converter, as these two things really allow this microphone to shine. Also, be sure to use a nice heavy will built mic stand, as this mic is fairly heavy and it could quite easily tip a budget mic stand. If your looking for a superior microphone that is capable of catching the most subtle nuances of the voice, or of the instrument, and applying rich warmth and character that will leave you breathless, than this is the mic for you.

Buy Fom Amazon Now

Womens Yurbuds Focus Behind The Ear Sport Earphones, Aqua, OS

Womens Yurbuds Focus Behind The Ear Sport Earphones, Aqua, OS
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
List Price: Price Unavailable
Sale Price: Price Unavailable
Today's Bonus:
Buy Now

I must have small ears because everything I have bought the buds would fall out during my runs. I bought these because they are built for small ears and I love them, they are very comfortable and stay put!

Buy Fom Amazon Now

Line 6 POD X3 Pro Guitar Multi Effects Processor

Line 6 POD X3 Pro Guitar Multi Effects Processor
Customer Ratings: 3.5 stars
List Price: Price Unavailable
Sale Price: Price Unavailable
Today's Bonus:
Buy Now

  • USB 2.0 multi-channel digital recording (stereo wet/dry per input); Studio-quality 24-bit A/D and D/A converters; 32-bit floating-point processing; S/PDIF and AES/EBU stereo digital audio inputs and outputs
  • 98 stompbox and studio effects (with Tap Tempo control for time-based effects); 78 guitar amp models, 24 guitar cab models, 28 bass amp models, 22 bass cab models, 6 vocal preamp models, A.I.R.(TM) II mic modeling with 4 mic options
  • Dual 1/4" instrument inputs; Dual XLR microphone inputs (with phantom power, trim adjust, signal/clip indicators and low cut filters); Stereo 1/4" line inputs; MIDI In/Out/Thru; FBV(TM) connector for optional pedal controller; Variax® Digital Interface
  • Stereo 1/4" outputs (with Amp/Line switch); Stereo XLR balanced line outputs (with ground lift and Mic/Line switch); Dual 1/4" unprocessed line outputs; Stereo 1/4" effects send and return; 1/4" stereo headphone output
  • Innovative routing options: send one guitar through two complete Amp/Effect signal chains simultaneously or independently process 2 separate inputs; Precision chromatic tuner with Audio Mute and Bypass options
  • USB 2.0 multi-channel digital recording; Studio-quality 24-bit A/D and D/A converters; 32-bit floating-point processing;
  • 98 stompbox and studio effects; 78 guitar amp models, 24 guitar cab models, 28 bass amp models, 22 bass cab models
  • Dual 1/4" instrument inputs; Dual XLR microphone inputs; Stereo 1/4" line inputs; MIDI In/Out/Thru; FBV connector for optional pedal controller;
  • Stereo 1/4" outputs; Stereo XLR balanced line outputs; Dual 1/4" unprocessed line outputs; Stereo 1/4" effects send and return;
  • Innovative routing options: send one guitar through two complete Amp/Effect signal chains simultaneously or independently
  • USB 2.0 multi-channel digital recording (stereo wet/dry per input); Studio-quality 24-bit A/D and D/A converters;
  • 98 stompbox and studio effects (with Tap Tempo control for time-based effects); 78 guitar amp models, 24 guitar cab models
  • Dual 1/4" instrument inputs; Dual XLR microphone inputs Stereo 1/4" line inputs; MIDI In/Out/Thru;
  • Stereo 1/4" outputs (with Amp/Line switch); Stereo XLR balanced line outputs (with ground lift and Mic/Line switch);
  • Innovative routing options: send one guitar through two complete Amp/Effect signal chains simultaneously or independently

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

Line6 gear is used by some of the biggest pros in the industry. Why then, is this unit which is labeled as "Pro" such a disappointment?

The GOOD: The sound is typical Line6. If you liked it before you will find it good now. The interface is a little confusing at first but can be learned quickly. There are knobs (and not just buttons) that allow adjustment of parameters in real time. The overall unit, although lightweight feels fairly sturdy. There are multiple inputs and even an effects loop in the unit itself for the addition of other effects.

The BAD: The knobs on the unit feel weak and spin freely as if they will fall off or break at any moment. Many of the presets while decent, sound similar. Effects are limitedif you buy this make sure you really need amp modeling and not just effects as the latter is lacking sorely and sound generic. There is a ton of hum generated by this thing. Doesn't matter if you lift the grounds, use it in front of the amp, in the loop or with the "4 cable" method. It hums and I could not stop it from humming badly.

While using mine the sound abruptly died more than once and resumed a few seconds later without explanation. Saved presets mysteriously disappeared and more than once I turned the unit on and was greeted by nothing but the blank orange screen...nothing else and no sound. While switching presets was typically silent there was on occasion a hiss or pop while switching. This was not typically a repeatable event which was even more frustrating.

The UGLY: Midi implementation is still not included fully in this "pro" unit. You might be able to change presets but your expression pedals probably won't work...even Line6's own FBV pedals do not fully work with this thing...is that a joke? The X3 Live folks have been waiting a year for full midi.

Upon ordering you are promised the full version of "Pod Farm Platinum" free by many sites. This is not without major catches. The software only runs as a VST plugin AND requires you use your unit as a giant "dongle" of sorts or Pod Farm won't work. So every time you want to use Pod Farm you'll need to drag a full size rack unit to your PC and hook it up...stupid.

Overall, if you really need good amp modeling and are running straight into a board or power amp then this unit might be for you. Most would be better served looking for another unit though. The PodXT is time-tested at this point and can be had cheaply on auction sites or here on Amazon. I would recommend that unit until this one is REALLY ready.

Buy Line 6 POD X3 Pro Guitar Multi Effects Processor Now

The Line 6 Pod X3 Pro has really great tones for just about every genre of music, the cleans are crisp and tight sounding, all the effects are very professional soundin and the options for creating your perfect tone are phenominal. It doesn't have a tube sound, but it cannot be expected to because it is not a tube amp, but that doesn't mean that you cannot get a great sounding tone from it. I am a believer in the Pod and I am all for this product!

Read Best Reviews of Line 6 POD X3 Pro Guitar Multi Effects Processor Here

I guess my title says it all! Seriously the Line 6 2.0 Pro and XT Pro, while offering less are stable. The X3 Pro and latest HD Pro continue a sad commentary on guitar processor wars to deliver on paper to entice buyers but lack the processing power. It takes little to get "SYSTEM OVERLOAD" on this. 85+ guitar amp simulations plus 20 odd bass amps and 8 or 10 vocal rooms but what good is it if it's all stuff you read in the manual or in details for unit that can't perform it and shuts down? Stick with "LESS IS MORE AND WORKS" over "MORE IN WORDS" that can't deliver! Better still, kick Line 6 in the A$$ and get them to raise the bar on the next Pod Pro!

Want Line 6 POD X3 Pro Guitar Multi Effects Processor Discount?

We can use this without PC compare with Guitar RIG. Sound good. Easy to control and set up for Stereo Device using Dual tone.

Buy Fom Amazon Now

I've long been a fan of Line6 products. I've used the bean-shaped Pod 2.0 for nearly a decade, and the Bass Pod XT Pro for half that. Both were amazing. I bought this unit to replace both of those and add vocals. Since i play/record vocals and bass as well as guitar, this unit seemed like a dream come true.

The Good:

Vocals, bass and effects are outstanding. Phantom power is a big plus. This thing also handles acoustic guitar (direct, mic'd, or even both simultaneously!!!) Very good sounds. And electric guitar clean sounds are FAR better than they were in the Pod 2.0.

The Bad:

I've spent nearly a month trying to tweak a good EVH brown sound, or an AC/DC hard rock sound, to no avail. All the crunch sounds come with a weird distorted hiss, which sounds somewhat like the digital simulation of a blown speaker. I've tried turning off all cab sims and all effects, using only the amp sim, and then the problem is EVEN MORE noticeable! Try a mild distortion on Two Tone with everything set to 50%... and everything but the amp sim off. Very bad sound. If you add cabs and mic sim and lots of effects & EQ, you can mask the problem pretty well and get a decent sound that fits nicely in the mix, but honestly, my Pod 2.0 had MUCH better crunch sounds. After a month of frustration, i got a tube preamp to run into the line input in the back of the pod x3 (awesome connectivity with this thing) and turn the amp sim off entirely. Then i add a cab sim and a bunch of effects and have that perfect, unbelievable sound i was after!

Overall:

This unit does everything well... except guitar. If you only want it for guitar, get something better (like Axe FX) But if you want it for an overall studio tool, the connections this unit provides, as well as the effects and vocal/bass sims, are more than worth it. I'm disappointed a bit about the dirty guitar sounds, but overall i'm happy with the unit. No matter how good modeling gets, tubes are always better, and forcing me into a tube preamp purchase was probably a favor from Line6 (albeit one they didn't intend)

PX3BK 88 Key Digital Performance Piano

PX3BK 88 Key Digital Performance Piano
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
List Price: $1,099.99
Sale Price: $727.00
Today's Bonus: 34% Off
Buy Now

  • Over 250 voices and 4 band EQ
  • Includes USB, MIDI, SD-card, Line in/out and 2 headphone outputs
  • Incredible 128-note Polyphony
  • DSP with 64 effects/combos
  • Weighted, scaled, hammer-action keys precisely replicate the touch of a real Grand Piano

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

As a 34 year Band & Choir director and professional musician, I've owned a number of weighted digital pianos from Korg to Yamaha to Casio Privia and Celviano models since the 80's. This piano is amazing the sounds are great and easily tweaked and saved. The "base" piano, organ, instrumental, gm sounds, etc. are great and can be easily mixed, layered and split. I didn't even use the manual for the first 6 weeks I owned it and still had a blast programming it. I've been playing piano since 1964 and this has one of the most real piano actions and touch that I've played. The "ivory touch" keys are just icing on the cake but I'll take it. Real midi ports, 1/4" outs, headphone jacks, USB connection and memory card round it out as a true professional keyboard that just so happens to only weigh 23 lbs.

Hardly a problem, but I would have made the buttons a little larger with a little bigger / brighter lettering and maybe a slightly larger display.

I have to admit, I just love to sit at it with a set of good headphones and just play I've "wasted" many hours doing that since it arrived.

Buy PX3BK 88 Key Digital Performance Piano Now

Please note that I'm writing this as someone who went looking for a piano-first instrument. My review is based off of this requirement. Also, the Yamaha I'm comparing it to is a mid-range ($1,200) composer/workstation keyboard with semi-weighted keys, so please take this into account.

I have been working with the Casio PX-3 for about a week now, and it's going back. I had hoped that it would be a relatively low-cost alternative to a Kawai, Yamaha or Roland DP, but it just isn't. To preface my review, I must say that my current home situation mandates that I use headphones fairly often, and this is, perhaps, where the problem lies (then again, many of the other commenters here indicate they use headphones often with this DP, so, it might just be my ears). Also, I play a lot of slower ballads that require large chord voicings, particularly in the midrange, so if you play a lot of ragtime, rock, etc., you might not hear any of this.

In general, I like to feel of the pseudo-ivory keys under my fingers. The key action is a bit mushy and heavy and they keys are a bit noisy and "thunk-y," but I don't mind this aspect of the piano as it falls within my normal boundary of acceptability. The controls are easy enough to work, all things considered, but they are a bit small and lack good tactile feedback. The decay on the piano sounds is a bit abrupt, but changing some of the custom settings helped this somewhat (but not totally to my satisfaction). Also, the note falloff under sustain pedal seemed far, far too abrupt, as well, but there might be a way to change that.

The piano sounds themselves are fair/good (nothing to write home about--again, under slower playing conditions), but some of the piano notes sound electronic-y to me, particularly in the midrange and during a sustain. While my Yamaha's piano sounds ring and resonate as they start to fade away, the Casio's sound like they're buzzing (it's somewhat video-gamey in nature; I guess this doesn't matter a ton except on the last chord/voicing of a phrase or the entire song?). Things also start to get a but muffled during complex chord voicing, even in the midrange (where I normally want chords to be well defined). My Yamaha seems to shine under the strain of complex chords while the PX-3 seems to falter. All of these things I could probably live with for $800, though.

What killed this DP for me was the amount of distortion behind the notes, particularly in the first B, C, and C# keys above middle C. If one turns the brilliance to 3, it's really, really noticeable. It's almost like the sampling rate used to record was much lower for these keys that all the rest. Put another way, while most of the other keys sound like MP3s sampled around 192, those three sound like they were sampled at around 96-112. The pronounced hissing behind these notes is terribly bad, even without the harsh distortion.

I noticed this initially through my speakers--I thought these two notes were simply hitting the harmonic resonance frequency of my speakerboxes at first (my speakers are quite good, so why I thought they had any time of resonance in this sense is beyond me). Unfortunately, clearly this wasn't the case after I put on some cheap headphones. Things got downright nasty after I put on my Ultrasone closed-back studio headphones. I played all of the other keys one-by-one to see if this very high level of distortion was isolated and it generally was; however, there's noticeable distortion behind all of the notes on the PX-3 which makes the overall reproduction of the piano sound a bit harsh (my Yamaha workstation also has this tendency, but it's far, far less pronounced--strangely, the worst distortion on my Yamaha comes from these same very three keys; what's up with that?? Even these three keys on my Yamaha at their worst is still better than the Casio's other keys at their best). I might be able to live with the harshness if I played faster songs or on a stage where detail isn't as important. More to the points, though, the distorted B, C, and C# keys are so incredibly bad that one can easily hear it even during complex chord voicings. If it were on one of the higher or lower sets of B, C, and C# keys, it would be alright, but since these are the set above middle C, I use them quite a bit. I even tried to convince myself that I could work around these three keys...but, yeah, that's when I realized I was trying to rationalize this far too much.

Now that I've heard this distortion, it can't be unheard. I noticed this same level of distortion in roughly 3/4 of the piano sounds. I didn't bother with the rest since I purchased this as a piano-first instrument. The distortion is exacerbated by turning the brilliance up to 3. The distortion can be mitigated by turning the brilliance down (especially to -3) and changing the attack to about 5 or 6. However, this leaves the piano sounds very muted and muffled, so this isn't really a good work-around for me.

If you're playing on stage or in a church, my guess is there will be so many other sound artifacts running around, you'd never notice this distortion. In these instances you might be playing through these notes quickly, anyhow, which will cut back on the distortion that seems to happen in these circumstances. If, on the other hand, you've purchased it to be used at home and you like to play songs with a slower pace or if you hold chords in your right hand for at least a beat, just be aware that this might be a problem.

I'm trying to be as even-handed as possible here--I'm the kind of person that got rid of a one-year old car because of a constant ticking noise it developed. No one, not even my SO, claimed they could hear it. It was there, though, and I wasn't crazy, and sounds like that simply bother me to death. Be sure to take this into account when reading this review. Also, you simply might not be bothered by the distortion at all. For $800 compared to $1,000 or more, most people could probably live with a few quirks. I wish I was one of those people sometimes.. Frankly, if you've heard this, I'd appreciate it if you'd leave a comment to let me know what your take is on this.

Given all of that, if you're looking for a light, portable, and budget stage piano, you should certainly give this a shot. As always, see if you can play it in the store before bringing it home. With this model, it would also be a good idea to bring some closed-back headphones with you, as well.

Read Best Reviews of PX3BK 88 Key Digital Performance Piano Here

Received my PX-3 from JR Music through Amazon a little over a month ago. It arrived on the date promised with no problems with the packaging or the setup. The PX-3 is what it is; a lightweight, small footprint, digital piano and midi controller. That is what I wanted and I am very happy with it.

It fits on my desk, it is easy to move around, and it is not flimsy. I'm big and play rather heavily and it seems stout enough.

I like the feel of the matte keys and the piano action. The piano samples are good, I don't use the EP tones much but they sound fine to me.

It works my JV-1010, "Band-ina-Box" and "Power-Tracks" with no problems. Setting up the layers for internal tones and external controls is easy after reading the manual. On the controller side I would have liked knobs, sliders and after-touch. It is possible to change the volume of an individual zone on the fly, but it takes a lot of coordination if I'm playing at the same time. Even given that, as a controller it is a lot easier to set things up on it than my old SL161 and it has the nice piano action.

I received the free gig bag for registering the piano from Casio within a month, it is very nice.

Want PX3BK 88 Key Digital Performance Piano Discount?

I am volunteering a review as I have been reading them for months and it is time to pay forward and back. Comments can give one a sound understanding; you just have to skip the ones that say: "I never played before, but this...." I have a Roland but never understood the half Japanese instructions since 1991, so I used it as a piano. Not a bad sound, thin, but old school toy keys. I did significant research and decided to try the PX-3, it being well received and was the least in price for items I was following. I have a suspicion that if you are well versed in all the options, voiced, splits, etc., and play band stuff, you will get a kick out of the PX-3. I wanted to join you and figure out all the magical functions, but I could not keep the PX-3 because the piano sound was, simply, not fun. I just realized I do not feel compelled to sit at the board and noodle. The resonance of a piano was missing, the sensual touch could not be achieved (and I worked at the settings to see if I were missing something.) If you play classical style music, ballads and enjoy the round sounds of a soft melody, the PX-3 is disheartening. That said, the bells and whistles seem impressive to me. So, piano people should move on; band people check it out.

Buy Fom Amazon Now

I am a professional pianist if that means getting paid to play: musicals, weddings, receptions, choral accompaniment. I've owned several digital pianos and used several more while teaching music in public schools. Favorites include Kurzweil, Yamaha and Roland boards.

But due to cost and weight, my go-to rig for several years has been a Privia PX-310 through Mackie SRM350 powered speakers. The PX-310 has never failed and I play with a fairly heavy classical touch. The piano sounds are decent though heavily processed. (Funny thing is, that board sounds quite good when I record it directly to my computer hard drive for demos and choral practice tracks.)

So why did I buy a PX-3? I wanted more editing capability, splits, layers and more realistic acoustic piano sounds. Did it deliver?

The editing options remind me of an Alesis QS-1 I owned years ago almost too much! It takes some time to drill down into the menu pages, but the power is there. The key touch/response differs from my Yamaha G2 grand in that the DP is clunkier and not as sensitive but certainly as good as the Fatar controller actions I've liked in the past. And there are many good sounds in all categories. But at first I was seriously unimpressed by the acoustic piano voices.

There's another review on Amazon that goes into detail about digital buzz, artifacts and uneven sample response across the keyboard range. If you're a purist, you should pay attention to that review. I had some of the same concerns through good headphones and in my studio with the monitors close to the board.

But today I used the PX-3 for the first time outside of my studio: a rehearsal for a classical piano duo recital in a retirement center chapel. There was no second acoustic piano available to pair with a well-maintained 5-8 grand piano. The room was fairly large with a bit of reverb 'hang time'. I spaced the Mackie speakers about 10 feet apart four feet off the floor.

As my duo partner and I ran through the program, I was stunned at the transformation in the perceived tone of the PX-3! The sound evened out, buzz became overtones (sort of) and the warmth/body almost matched that of the grand! The other pianist commented several times on the authenticity of the sound. (I was using "Grand Piano 2" with brightness set at +1 and no equalization.)

Bottom line: I probably wouldn't use the PX-3 for critical recording, but as a performance DP it is very impressive for its price, light weight and realistic acoustic piano sounds.

Sennheiser HD201 Lightweight Over-Ear Binaural Headphones

Sennheiser HD201 Lightweight Over-Ear Binaural Headphones
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $29.95
Sale Price: $24.42
Today's Bonus: 18% Off
Buy Now

This product is one of the best bang for the buck items I have ever owned. They may end up costing me a bundle, however.

The HD201 came to my attention after reading a little debate on headphones on a bulletin board I frequent. Someone recommended the HD201s as being phenomenal for the money.

I'm not an audiophile, but I do enjoy music and computer games where sound is important, so I thought I'd give them a try. The only other "cans" I've used have been the cheapos that come with portable CD players and a pair of Coby CV-200s that I bought seeking something cheap that would be better than the poor quality phones I have had in the past. The Coby units were a minor improvement, but bass rumbled like crazy.

Enter the HD201s. These closed phones (they cover the ear with a foam pad instead of sitting on top of them) have a padded plastic headband, a long 10' cord that terminates in a mini jack (it comes with a 1/4" adapter). The earpieces have some swivel to them, and they fit my rather large head and ears just fine. Comfort level was as good as any headphone I was used to. I plugged them in to my computer (with a decidedly basic 5.1 soundcard) and began to listen.

The sound is jaw-dropping if you are used to the garbage that ships with portable music devices. I popped in some CDs, from classical to metal, and the lack of rumble in the bass and the clear highs were a treat. Remember, I'm no audiophile (yet) but even to my tin and uneducated ear, the difference was easy to hear. Violins in "Adagio for Strings" were strong and clear, gone was the low rumble in the deep bass of Zep, and I even began to truly note the shortcomings of the audio in some MP3 and "oldies" recordings. Sound in games was great, and I caught some nuances in first person shooters that improved my play.

I was now aware of the shortcomings of all the other cheapo headphones I had used, including the Coby unit, that until now I had considered "good enough". They just flat out sound better across the full range of sound, from low to high.

I was a bit surprised that I could max out the volume on my computer without making the HD201s too painful...perhaps they are designed with more power in mind than my system delivers. My portable CD player drives them to about the same volume levels, loud, but not ear shattering. They might not satisfy those looking for super booming bass or earsplitting volume, but perhaps an amplifier might change this.

I can't give your an expert review of the HD201s, nor translate what the tech specs on the box mean. I can tell you that for the price, I am deeply impressed with the quality of sound. I would be impressed if they cost a few times as much.

A true bargain, but I worry that this might be the launching point in to a world of audio gear that I can scarce afford. If these things sound this good, perhaps I really need headphones made by Grado or the high end Sennhieser stuff, a new soundcard, probably an amp, and about the system in the living room.....

Click Here to Read More Reviews >>

In summary this headphone has one general strength:

1) Decent sounding depending on your tastes and needs, given the price, and given the kind of sound you get from most other closed headphones of similar price.

However, the Sennheiser HD201 has 4 important weaknesses:

1) Has very low sensitivity: it takes a lot of volume/power to bring them to satisfactory or normal loudness levels.

2) It's a bit bright, bass is slightly lacking, making them sound slightly thin or "weak".

3) Has a tendency to be SSSSSSSibilant with some female vocals.

4) For a closed headphone, doesn't isolate that much.

Weakness #1 is critical if you are considering these headphones for listening to music from your laptop or portable players. If that's the case, it's very likely you won't be happy with the sound even at max volume. These headphones are REALLY hard to bring up to normal loudness levels. If you will use them with the headphone out of a receiver, or maybe with an electric piano (as I am), then you are probably ok.

Weakness #2 is very important if you are what's called a "bass-head". These headphones won't give you slamming rich bass. Bass is (slightly) on the weak side.

Weakness #3 is critical if you listen to a lot of female vocals, and you find it particularly annoying when your playback system enhances the letter "S" as in SSSSSSSay, SSSSSSilver, SSSSSSpoon, preCCCCCiSSSSSe, etc.

Weakness #4 is important if you are expecting these headphones to block all noises around you, you might be slightly dissapointed, it does block a bit but not too much.

If you don't care about isolation I would highly recommend the Koss KSC-75 instead of these Sennheisers. If you do want a closed headphone (either you want some isolation from outside noise, or you don't want to bother anyone around you with your music), and are willing to spend a little more, you should consider the Sennheiser HD280 or maybe the Audio Technica AT500.

The above sounds like a massive critique, and I'm giving it 3 stars because really for music these are not that great sounding headphones to me. However, these headphones sound relatively OK compared to how boomy or treble-happy are most other cheap headphones, whether open or closed. Compared to that trend, these are relatively decent. Yet, compared to other very inexpensive headphones known for surprisingly good sound (e.g. Koss KSC-75) these are not that great really.

PS. Another suggestion in general, if you are looking for any headphone related information you must check it's really the place online for anything headphone-related.

Buy Sennheiser HD201 Lightweight Over-Ear Binaural Headphones Now

Basically, I needed a new pair of headphones after I got tired of the Sony MDR-V150s that my roommate lent me. I did not like the idea of having the "cups" right ON my ear, and honestly, they did not sound all that great so I decided to do some searching. I looked at Koss(I did not like any of their models) AKG( I love them, but, for $100, I did not get involved with them.) So, I decided to search some more..

I totally forgot about Sennheiser headphones. I heard them once at an ultra high end home stereo shop in Tampa, Florida and they sounded damn good. So when I saw these for less than $20, I decided to buy them..

First of all, they arrived sooner than usual. I put them on and I noticed something...I could not hear any outside noise. These "cans" really kept outside sound out. They sat comfortably on my head and the "cups" covered my ears. Score!! Now, for the sound..

I listen to a lot of music that I have on my pc. I have a Dell Dimension E310 with the ORIGINAL sound card and I have the Mp3s on Musicmatch WITHOUT any equalization. First of all, I chose tracks at random, all kinds and I heard things that I never heard before. I noticed tiny "cracks" on Avenged Sevenfold's "Seciond Heartbeat." Something I did not notice with the Sony's. I listened to all types of music and found the sound TOTALLY clean. No hissing, no muddy or "sour" midrange. Female vocals sounded great. Even the low end sounded great, specially with house and trance music that have a lot of heavy bottom end to them.

BUT, I decided to try them on my Panasonic SA-XR55, which is a digital receiver, and I decided to "crank" it up. As I reached the higher volumes, the bass was lost, it sounded weak and muddy, but that WAS when I was pushing the receiver to its limits.

These "cans" are great for listening to music at REGULAR volumes. If you want a pair of headphones that you can crank them up loud so they can sound like a car audio bass challenge, go for something like the AKGs.

Great "cans" for the money, I TOTALLY recommend them.

So here we go:

Pros:

They fit great, with even a leatherret piece on the top band of the headphones to keep things cushy.

Great sound isolation. I can't hear squat once I put them on WITHOUT music.

Gorgeous sound at "normal" levels. I do not care if you listen to Rap, Christian, House or Trance, you will get a great sound out of these.

Built very well. They look like they do not move or swivel in the picture, but they do, and are very comfortable.

Cons:

NOT made for LOUD listening.

Not really digging the double cord that comes out of the headphones. Single sided would be better, but that is just me.

And to be honest, I cannot find anything else wrong with them.

So, if you just want to get some "cans" that are great sounding, without breaking your wallet, get these.

Trust me.

You will thank me later.

Read Best Reviews of Sennheiser HD201 Lightweight Over-Ear Binaural Headphones Here

I'm listening to music on my newly purchased HR201s right now and I'm pretty happy with them.

I wanted a cheap pair of headphones to keep around my office and the standard iPod ear buds weren't cutting it -after an hour or so in my ears, they really started to hurt.

I would describe the sound on the 201s as gentle and smooth. The bass seems to be rolled off quite a bit (though this could be an impedance mismatch with my iPod, I don't know) but the mids and highs are, while not even, very pleasant. I think I'll be able to listen to music for hours at a time without getting fatigued -they may also come with me to the local internet coffee shop on weekends.

I tend to dislike cheap, closed cans because the bass is usually boosted beyond all reason. These are much more reasonable. I tend to listen to modern jazz and classical but have been known to throw in Autechre, Squarepusher, Underworld, Nine Inch Nails, and others and feel that this is a reasonable choice for $20 even if your music is mostly electronic or bass-heavy.

Want Sennheiser HD201 Lightweight Over-Ear Binaural Headphones Discount?

I almost never ever review items unless I am really surprised with their quality. And that can go both ways. Unfortunately it is not in a good way this time around.

I bought these when I needed a second pair of headphones because I took my first pair (Philips SBC HP170) to use at work and wanted to leave a pair at home. Well, I ended up rarely using them at home until recently I decided to give them a shot.

I took them to work and have been listening to them every day for the last 3 days, about 6 hours on average (I'm a software developer).

At first I thought that something was wrong with my sound output because I had to crank up the volume to FULL on the system and take it down a notch from there. They have very poor sensitivity it seems. Now I understand why I could never get strong enough sound from my laptop either a while back. I just ignored it that time.

Secondly, I turned up the bass in WinAmp's equalizer because these headphones barely have any bass response. However, all that did was muddy up the sound, didn't really do much with the bass. No matter how I played with the equalizer I couldn't get these to work right. Now it got to the point where I'm listening to music that I used to listen to on my old headphones and I HAD to stop what I was doing because the poor quality of these headphones made me so frustrated that I couldn't focus on work!

I unplugged the HD201s and plugged back in my old cheap, (I think they cost me 17 bucks at RiteAid a few years ago), Philips HP170s. Wow, I'm back to normal now!

Overall I would definitely agree with the review named "Not loud enough, sibilant, slightly bright." It's rare that I get frustrated (or happy) enough with a product to take the time to review it but this is one of those times.

Good luck!

Buy Fom Amazon Now